AI Pregnancy Announcement Generator
It Draws. It Does Not Lay Out.

Every Letter Correct, Including the French Surname. Now Look at What It Added.

Start here, because it is the opposite of what this site usually reports. The prompt asked for BABY MERCIER on one line and DUE MAY 2027 on the next, in plain unaccented capitals. That is exactly what came back: both lines spelled correctly, the numerals right, the letterforms clean and evenly weighted — and no invented accent on MERCIER, which is the failure that fires on almost every French or Spanish word this model is given. Then read the rest of the instruction. It asked for both lines to be the same width; line two is visibly narrower than line one. It did not ask for a horizontal rule between them, and there is one. And it asked for a full-bleed square with no drop shadow and no border, and what arrived is a photograph of a card lying on a table, casting its own shadow, reaching none of the four edges. The spelling is the easy part. The layout is where it stops listening.

Three Pairs Asked For, Three Pairs Delivered. The Pairs Themselves Are Not Pairs.

The count is right, which on this model is worth saying out loud: three pairs, six shoes, all facing the same way on roughly one baseline, and nothing else on the blanket. This is the most reliable announcement image of the six and the one most people actually want. The failure is one level down. Crop into the brown boots and they are not mirror images of each other — the right boot carries a long diagonal seam from the lace row to the sole that the left boot simply does not have, and their collars are different shapes and widths. Crop into the booties and the two bows are plainly different: one is a fat, roughly even bow sitting near the centre, the other is lopsided with one loop much larger than the other, and neither tie passes through an eyelet or a channel — both cords emerge from the knitting and go nowhere. Nobody notices this at thumbnail size. It is the same defect as the border below, in a gentler form.

Asked to Leave the Frame Empty, It Left the Frame Genuinely Empty

This is the most useful image on the page and the reason the presets above are built the way they are. The prompt asked for the entire inside of the frame to be left completely plain and empty, with no picture, no pattern, no shading and no text of any kind — and that is precisely what it did, first try, right down to adding a clean white mount. Compositional constraints like this one are the instructions this model obeys most reliably, which is why every preset here deliberately leaves you a blank area rather than trying to write in it. Drop your scan, your bump photo or your own lettering into that space afterwards and you get the spelling your family actually uses. One flaw to note, in the usual place: look at the shelf just in front of the bottom-left corner of the frame and there is a small sprig of five leaves lying there, joined to no stem and belonging to no plant. The trailing vine from the pot is a separate thing entirely.

One Border, Asked to Repeat Identically. It Never Repeats Once.

This is the single most important image here, and it is invisible until you enlarge it. The prompt could not have been plainer: every footprint exactly the same size, the same shape and the same orientation as every other one, spaced at identical intervals the whole way round. At full size it looks like a tasteful gold border. Crop the top edge and the prints are lying on their sides with their heels gone, reduced to kidney beans with a scatter of toe dots beside them — four dots on some, five on others — at three different sizes and with gaps that run from almost touching to twice that. The two corner prints, meanwhile, are upright and fully formed, so the border does not even keep one rule. Crop the left edge and the prints do stand upright, but two of the nine are flipped so their toes point downwards while the other seven point up. A printed border is a repeat. This model draws every instance from scratch.

Ten Fingers, Two Thumbs, All Correctly Separated

Worth including precisely because it goes right. Hands are this model’s most notorious weakness, and asked for two of them with every finger visible and clearly separated, it delivered exactly that: four fingers and a thumb per hand, each one distinct, none fused, none doubled, none with an extra joint, and the knit texture on the booties is genuinely lovely. So the warnings elsewhere on this page are about specific failures, not about a tool that cannot be trusted with anything. The one thing it quietly sidestepped is worth naming, though, because it is a pattern: the prompt asked for both palms facing up, cupped side by side, with no finger hidden behind the booties. What arrived is two hands standing vertically, fingers pointing up, with the booties sitting squarely in front of the fingers. It did not fail the difficult instruction. It rearranged the picture so the instruction stopped applying.

A Beautiful Photograph. The Upper Hand Has No Arm Behind It.

Look at it once and it is the maternity shot people pay a photographer for: warm rim light, a clean silhouette, the dress falling well. Look at the hand resting on the top of the bump and follow it back towards her shoulder. There is nothing there. The wrist ends and behind it is blurred window — no forearm, no sleeve, no upper arm, no shoulder it could belong to. The only complete arm in the picture is the near one, and it runs all the way down to the lower hand. The hand itself is anatomically fine, five digits, correctly shaped; it is simply attached to no one. Two smaller things in the same frame: the brief asked for the crop to start at the shoulders so that no face is shown, and it came back including the chin, mouth, nose and hair; and the window ledge behind her resumes noticeably higher on the right of her dress than it sits on the left. Follow every arm from a hand back to a shoulder before you send a photograph like this to anybody.